Do you think that YOU should be presumed guilty when there is no evidence or suspicion that you are anything but innocent?
Do you think that the government should divert existing resources away from children who are KNOWN to be at risk, to areas where there are no causes for concern?
Do you think that the government is in a better position than YOU to assess YOUR childs needs?
Do you think YOU should be assumed to be failing your child unless you sign a contract with the government even though there is no evidence or suspicion of failure?
Do you think that YOU should have to sign a contract with the government and fill out a yearly plan of how you are going to serve your childs needs and face legal action if your plans change, even if those changes are positive ones?
Do you think that YOU should have a CRB check in order to be allowed to look after YOUR OWN children, or your families or friends children?
Do you think that a government representative should be allowed to interview YOUR child alone, without you or another trusted adult present, if there is no evidence or even suspicion, of abuse or mistreatment?
Do you think that a government representative should be allowed to enter your home without your consent without there being any evidence of a crime?
If you answered 'NO' to these questions and haven't signed this petition yet - Why not?
Please sign our urgent petition http://petitions.number10.gov.uk/Home-ed-families/ - PLEASE REMEMBER TO CLICK ON THE LINK IN THE CONFIRMATION EMAIL YOU WILL RECEIVE FROM NUMBER 10, OR YOUR SIGNATURE WILL NOT BE COUNTED :(
The Integrated Communities Strategy Green Paper - Hugely helpful summary about the real situation regarding the Green Paper from HE Byte.